It really is a burden when asked to qualify a new plant that is almost completed...!
I have this unfortunate incidence whereby the owner requested for my service to qualify their plant, after the 'qualification' done by their respective supplier was found not to be in compliance to GMP.
Suppliers are not to be blamed. I blamed the M&E consultant for their ignorance in differentiating the 'qualification' needs between Good Engineering Practise (GEP) and GMP and highlighting it to the appointed contractor/supplier. The documentation needs and focus required by GMP is different from GEP. While GEP focus on the capability and safety of the facility, GMP focus more on the performance and ability to maintain product integrity and quality. Some (if not most) of the activities overlap. A well prepared qualification plan will cunningly make use of what's done under GEP to incorporate into qualification as required by GMP.
The recent ISPE conference in Singapore highlighted this matter in their pre-conference workshop and even provide examples on how this can be effectively done. To me, this is logic which should have been adopted much earlier if not for the 'narrow mindness' of some practitioner that GEP is a total separation from GMP.
Having said all that, the qualification of facility is still laborious and time consuming. The delay in initiating this effor, concurrent with the commission done by suppleir, will further aggravate the problem one have to face.
How I wish this qualification job was 'given' earlier to me as their GMP consultant, rather than entrusting it to the supplier....... but how can I reject...?
AJ.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment